PLATTE
CANYON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1
TABOR
NOTICE
QUESTION
NO. 3A
PARK
COUNTY, COLORADO
NOTICE OF
ELECTION TO INCREASE TAXES ON A REFERRED MEASURE
Election
Date: Tuesday, November 4,
2003
Election Hours: 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M.
Local election office address and phone number: 501 Main Street, PO Box 220, Fairplay, CO 80440, 719-836-4333
Ballot Title and Text:
REFERENDUM 3A
SHALL PLATTE CANYON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 TAXES BE INCREASED $100,000 ANNUALLY, OR SUCH LESSER AMOUNT AS THE BOARD OF EDUCATION MAY DETERMINE, COMMENCING IN TAX YEAR 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF OPERATING, MAINTAINING, EQUIPPING, AND IMPROVING THE MARGE E. HUDAK PUBLIC SWIMMING POOL SO LONG AS IT IS OPERATED BY THE PLATTE CANYON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, WITH THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH TAXES TO BE COLLECTED AND SPENT BY THE DISTRICT AS A VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE AND SPENDING CHANGE IN EACH YEAR WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY SPENDING OR REVENUE LIMITATIONS CONTAINED IN SECTION 20 OF ARTICLE X OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION?
Summary of written comments FOR the
proposal:
The Marge E. Hudak Public Pool, located at
Platte Canyon High School, is the only public indoor recreation facility in
Northern Park County. The Marge E. Hudak Pool was built in 1976 with community
program federal grant monies and is a community asset valued at $7,000.000 by
the original architectural firm.
Current pool programs include Red Cross
Certified swim lessons for preschool, school-age and home-school children,
specialized swim stroke classes, as well as a variety of fitness classes for adults
and seniors. Lap Swim and Open Swim sessions are regularly scheduled for the
public. Three competitive swim teams train at the facility, the Platte Swim
Club a summer swim team, and the Platte Canyon High School Boys and Girls
Huskies Swim Teams. Lifeguard Training Classes and Certification permit high
school students and community members to obtain jobs utilizing these skills at
the pool or in jobs throughout their lifetimes. Cardiovascular and weight
training equipment are also available to the public. Disabled persons and
persons undergoing physical therapy rehabilitation regularly use the pool.
In 2002-2003 the pool and recreation
facilities had over 20,000 visits. Seventy-three percent of these visits were
from the community and 27% from schools.
Because of budget limitations, the Platte
Canyon School District can no longer fund community use of the pool with its
educational funds. Options are being sought to allow continued community use of
the pool.
This referendum proposes that $100,000 per
year in property taxes be collected to support the community use of the pool.
This is calculated to be $9 or less per year per $100,000 of assessed property
value (much less than market real estate value) or less than $18 per year for a
house assessed at $200,000.
THE POOL WILL BE ABLE TO CONTINUE
COMMUNITY SWIMMING PROGRAMS FOR ALL AGES, such as, but not limited to the
following:
ü
Lap Swim
ü
Aquacise Classes (High and Low intensity)
ü
Water Walking / Physical Therapy
ü
Open Swim
ü
Cardiovascular Exercise Equipment
ü
Weight Training Equipment
ü
Youth Programs
ü
Stroke Improvement Classes
ü
Platte Swim Club (competitive youth summer league)
American Red Cross Programs offered:
ü
Learn to Swim Program
ü
Community Water Safety
ü
First Aid / CPR
ü
Guard Start
ü
Lifeguard Training
Summary of comments AGAINST the
proposal:
VOTE NO on 3A
The Marge Hudak pool is owned by the
Platte Canyon School District RE-1. It
is used by students during schools hours, and is open to public use for about
30 hours per week. RE-1 funds the pool for usage by the students during school
hours, and public individual users pay a usage fee during the public use times.
RE-1 will continue to have its full
usage of the pool, even if this property tax increase fails; however, RE-1 is
no longer willing to fund the public use of the pool.
Alternatives to a property tax
increase:
·
RE-1 reverse its decision to de-fund the pool. Taxpayers
probably prefer that RE-1 direct as much funding as possible to academics and
meeting State CSAP requirements, not to the pool. No more spending on non-
academic luxuries like the $1.75 million spent on the football field.
·
Reduce pool costs. Further decrease the hours of public use
during low usage hours. Similar to the action taken by library districts
throughout the metro area.
·
Increase marketing efforts to public users. The public user
should pay the actual cost required to support public usage. Raise or lower
public use fees to maximize usage and revenue. Trial-and-error. More swim
classes and competitions may attract more users. If these options fail to
generate revenue, then it indicates broad public support does not exist, and this
property tax increase is just another example of special interest group
politics.
·
Seek private donations or sponsorships.
·
Contract-out operation of the pool to a private operator with the
provision that RE-1 usage is a requirement. RE-1 has already successfully
contracted-out several other school support functions.
In times of tight personal finances,
voters' first priority is the maintenance and improvement of educational
standards, not unrelated community activities. Rejecting this property tax
increase will have absolutely no affect on academic programs. Public usage
of the pool is a separate issue and should not be confused with maintaining
educational excellence.
Other school districts, have found that
asking voters for dedicated property taxes for identifiable purposes is a
divide-and-conquer strategy for property tax increases that voters would
otherwise reject. Approving this property tax will encourage Platte Canyon
Schools to do likewise. Amendment 23, passed by state voters in 2000, gives the
schools an additional 1 % above inflation per pupil funding, every year.
Properly managed, adequate funding exists. Approving property tax increases
removes the needed discipline to prioritize competing spending demands.
Individual homeowners prioritize spending in their personal finances, every
day.
This property tax increase is a band-aid,
not a long-term fix. Will there be another property tax increase if public pool
usage declines further? Deal with the problem now. Approving a property tax
increase is not the best option.
VOTE NO on 3A
| 1A | 1B/C | 3A | 3B/C | Index |